Blog

/

Guides

/

Best Local AI Image Generators in 2026: Apps and Models

Best Local AI Image Generators in 2026: Apps and Models

Compare local image-generation apps and seven model configurations, with RTX 5090 measurements and examples in three visual styles.

Best Local AI Image Generators in 2026: Apps and Models
Alex Shapiro
Alex Shapiro
Calendar icon

September 25, 2026

Table of Contents

The best local AI image generator depends on how you want to work. Atomic Chat combines local chat with image generation, ComfyUI exposes detailed node workflows, Krita AI Diffusion works inside your artwork, and Draw Things is built for Apple devices.

An app provides the interface and editing tools. The image model determines much of the output and the memory required. This guide compares both, with seven model configurations benchmarked in stable-diffusion.cpp on an RTX 5090 at 1024 × 1024.

Best Local AI Image Generators at a Glance

AppPlatformsLearning curveModels and workflowEditingAPILicensePrice
Atomic ChatmacOS, Windows, LinuxLowCurated stable-diffusion.cpp catalogModel-dependent Create, Transform, Reference, EditOpenAI-compatible local endpointEngine: MITFree download
ComfyUIWindows, macOS, LinuxHighBroad model ecosystem, custom nodesWorkflow-dependentYesGPL-3.0Free
InvokeAIWindows, macOS, LinuxMediumGuided generation and canvas workCanvas and masking toolsYesApache-2.0Free
SwarmUIWindows, Linux; community macOS pathsMediumMultiple local backendsYesYesMITFree
Krita AI DiffusionWindows, macOS, LinuxMediumKrita plugin workflowLayers, masks, regional workNo general-purpose APIGPL-3.0Free
Stability MatrixWindows, macOS, LinuxLow to mediumLauncher for several local appsDepends on launched appDepends on launched appAGPL-3.0Free
Draw ThingsmacOS, iOS, iPadOSLowApple-Silicon-focused appImage workflows and inpaintingLocal API and scriptingCommunity repo: GPL-3.0Free
Fooocus, A1111, ForgeMostly Windows and LinuxLow to mediumEstablished Stable Diffusion ecosystemYesVariesGPL-3.0 / AGPL-3.0Free

Choosing a tool ultimately comes down to personal preference, so we used three criteria to keep the selection consistent: support for key workflows such as text-to-image and image-to-image, an active community, and ongoing development.

DiffusionBee remains available, but its public repository last received a push in October 2024. Check current model support before choosing it for a new setup.

The Best Local AI Image Generator Apps

Atomic Chat

Atomic Chat is a desktop application for running local AI models. It combines local chat with image generation in one app and runs image models through the stable-diffusion.cpp engine.

The app downloads and manages the engine, model weights, VAEs, and text encoders required by each image model.

Atomic Chat Create images screen with Qwen-Image Q4_K_M, 1024 by 1024 resolution and 20 steps.
Create images in Atomic Chat: Qwen-Image Q4_K_M, 1024 × 1024, 20 steps. This app demonstration is separate from the RTX 5090 benchmark.

The current catalog supports Create, Transform, Reference, and Edit, depending on the model. Other workflow labels visible in the sidebar are not supported by these catalog models.

  • Create generates a new image from a prompt
  • Transform changes an existing image using a prompt
  • Reference uses an image as visual input
  • Edit applies targeted changes to an image.
Atomic Chat Images sidebar showing image workflows; availability depends on the loaded model.
The Images section in Atomic Chat. Available workflows depend on the loaded model.

Atomic Chat unloads a chat model when it cannot fit in memory alongside the image model. This coordinates local chat and image generation within the same app.

Atomic Chat also exposes an OpenAI-compatible image-generation endpoint at http://localhost:1337/v1/images/generations. The endpoint uses the image model currently loaded in the Images section and returns images as base64 (response_format b64_json).

This lets you use your self-hosted AI image generator from your own app, connect it to another interface, or plug it into an AI system that supports the OpenAI image API.

Choose Atomic Chat if you want an easy to use but feature-rich local AI app for offline chat and image generation.

ComfyUI

ComfyUI is an open source AI image generator built around a visual node graph. In it, you connect nodes for the model, text encoders, prompt, sampler, VAE, source images, control inputs, and output. Sort of like Blender nodes, although you can also save and upload workflows created by other users in JSON.

The app also includes a model library, workflow templates, a queue for pending jobs, and a local API.

It supports checkpoints, diffusion models, VAEs, text encoders, LoRAs, ControlNets, adapters, upscalers, custom nodes. ComfyUI supports workflows that combine generation, editing, masking, compositing, and batch processing.

However, its node-based interface takes time to learn, and the learning curve is considerably steeper than with more conventional image-generation apps.

comfyui interface

ComfyUI interface. Source: ComfyUI's official GitHub repository.

Choose ComfyUI if you want to build, save, and reuse detailed image-generation workflows with direct control over every stage of the pipeline.

InvokeAI

InvokeAI is a local creative studio for image generation and editing. It combines a polished browser-based interface with a desktop launcher and a Unified Canvas for working across images in a freeform, Figma-like workspace. It also supports reusable workflows and a local API, making it useful for repeatable production pipelines as well as interactive editing.

invokeai interface

InvokeAI interface. Source: InvokeAI's official website.

Choose InvokeAI if you want a dedicated local image workspace with a canvas-first editing workflow.

SwarmUI

SwarmUI is a local image-generation interface with support for multiple backends. It combines a familiar prompt-and-settings screen with more advanced tools such as a ComfyUI-style workflow view. It can also run on one computer or coordinate work across several GPUs, making it relevant for power users and shared local setups.

swarmui interface

SwarmUI interface. Source: SwarmUI's official GitHub repository.

Choose SwarmUI if you want a full-featured local generation interface with both standard controls and access to ComfyUI workflows.

Krita AI Diffusion

Krita AI Diffusion is a plugin that adds local AI image generation to Krita. It works with Krita layers, selections, masks, vector shapes, and brushwork, so generated images and manual edits stay in the same document.

It supports text-to-image generation, inpainting, upscaling, regional prompts, ControlNet inputs, reference images, and live painting. Krita AI Diffusion runs through a local ComfyUI backend that the plugin can install and configure. In practice, it works as a local AI image editor: you can generate inside a selection, extend a scene, refine a small area, or use sketches and line art as input.

krita ai diffusion interface

Krita AI Diffusion interface. Source: Krita AI Diffusion's official GitHub repository.

Choose Krita AI Diffusion if you already work in Krita and want local AI generation, inpainting, and control inputs.

Stability Matrix

Stability Matrix is a desktop manager for local image-generation software. It installs, updates, and launches applications such as ComfyUI, AUTOMATIC1111, Forge, Fooocus, InvokeAI, and SwarmUI. Compatible applications can share the same model directory for checkpoints, LoRAs, and VAEs.

It manages packages, model downloads, and local environments in one place. If you regularly switch between different tools because each covers a different part of your workflow, it can also make that setup much easier to manage from one place.

stability matrix interface

Stability Matrix interface. Source: Stability Matrix's official GitHub repository.

Choose Stability Matrix if you want to install, manage, and compare several local AI image applications from one desktop tool.

Draw Things

Draw Things runs on macOS, iOS, and iPadOS. It supports local generation and includes masking, inpainting, upscaling, ControlNet, LoRAs, and an image gallery. It also provides a local API server and scripting.

Because it is designed around Apple Silicon and Metal, it is well optimized for Mac hardware. It is also one of the easiest options to install and start using on macOS.

draw things interface

Draw Things interface. Source: Draw Things on the Mac App Store.

Choose Draw Things if you use a Mac and want a native local image-generation app with a broad set of editing controls.

Honorable mentions

Fooocus, AUTOMATIC1111 WebUI, and Forge were among the early popular local web interfaces in the Stable Diffusion ecosystem. However, these projects are no longer as actively maintained as they once were, so they wouldn’t be our first choices in 2026.

To briefly explain what each one offers:

  • Fooocus is the simplest of the three, with a strong focus on straightforward, prompt-based image generation.
  • AUTOMATIC1111 WebUI became a reference point in the ecosystem thanks to its large extension library and familiar txt2img and img2img workflows.
  • Forge is a performance-focused fork of AUTOMATIC1111 that adds improved resource management and support for more experimental models and features.
fooocus interface

Fooocus interface. Source: Fooocus's official GitHub repository.

The Best Open Models for Local Image Generation

Local image generation pipeline from prompt through text encoder, image model and VAE decoder to image.
The app controls the workflow; the local engine runs the model components.

These open-weight image models can run on your own computer. Their memory requirements, editing modes, and license terms differ. Some allow commercial model use; others require separate permission.

The Q4_K_M and Q4_K labels in the model tables identify GGUF quantizations used by the local engine.

ModelRecommended model + encodersModes in Atomic ChatLicenseBest considered for
Z-Image Turbo4.7 + 2.6 GiBCreateApache-2.0Smaller first local download
FLUX.2 Klein 4B2.4 + 7.8 GiBCreate, TransformApache-2.0Image transformation
FLUX.1 schnell6.4 + 9.7 GiBCreateApache-2.0FLUX prompt-to-image workflow
FLUX.1 Krea Dev6.5 + 9.7 GiBCreateFLUX.1 dev, non-commercialModel-use restrictions; output terms differ
Krea 2 Turbo6.7 + 2.6 GiBCreateKrea 2 Community LicenseCommercial use below revenue threshold
Qwen-Image12.2 + 4.6 GiBCreateApache-2.0Text-forward images
Qwen-Image-2.13.9 + 6.4 GiBCreate, Reference, EditQwen Research, non-commercialReference-led edits

Testing methodology and results

Tests ran on stable-diffusion.cpp master-883-137f740 using the CUDA backend with flash attention and direct convolution enabled. For each model, we measured generation time from start to final image render, along with resident and peak VRAM usage: resident is what the model holds between images, peak is the maximum during a render, sampled every 100 ms. All memory figures in this article are in GiB (1,024 MiB); nvidia-smi reports memory in MiB; graphics card capacities are quoted in the GB that vendors print on the box.

The results are shown below:

ModelStepsSeconds/image after warm-upVRAM residentVRAM peak
FLUX.2 Klein 4B41.76 s9.4 GiB15.9 GiB
FLUX.1 schnell42.80 s16.7 GiB23.2 GiB
Z-Image Turbo83.81 s8.1 GiB14.6 GiB
Krea 2 Turbo85.71 s9.9 GiB17.2 GiB
FLUX.1 Krea Dev2011.42 s16.8 GiB23.3 GiB
Qwen-Image2025.47 s17.0 GiB24.4 GiB
Qwen-Image-2.14038.98 s9.7 GiB19.3 GiB

Each model generated 1024 × 1024 images on an RTX 5090, running inside a stable-diffusion.cpp build. We used Atomic Chat’s recommended quantization along with the catalog defaults for steps, CFG, sampler, and guidance, and fixed the seed at 42. These times compare the recommended configurations, including different step counts; they do not measure application-to-application speed. The three example categories are photography, text in an image, and illustration.

Z-Image Turbo

Z-Image Turbo is a text-to-image model from Tongyi-MAI. It is the lowest-memory setup in this comparison. Official model source.

Three image examples generated with z image turbo, from the article test.

Z-Image Turbo, Q4_K_M, seed 42, 1024 × 1024.

Model configurationValue
Model and supporting files4.7 GiB + 2.6 GiB
Atomic Chat setupQ4_K_M model; Qwen3-4B Q4_K_M encoder; FLUX VAE
Loaded weights7.2 GiB
Default8 steps
LicenseApache-2.0
RTX 5090 benchmark, 1024 × 1024Result
Time per image after warm-up3.81 s
Resident VRAM8.1 GiB
Peak VRAM14.6 GiB

Z-Image Turbo uses a smaller text encoder than the FLUX.1 models. Resident VRAM was 8.1 GiB; peak usage rose to 14.6 GiB during generation.

FLUX.2 Klein 4B

FLUX.2 Klein 4B is a 4B-parameter image model from Black Forest Labs. Official model source.

Three image examples generated with flux2 klein 4b, from the article test.

FLUX.2 Klein 4B, Q4_K_M, four steps, seed 42, 1024 × 1024.

Model configurationValue
Model and supporting files2.4 GiB + 7.8 GiB
Atomic Chat setupQ4_K_M model; bf16 Qwen3-4B encoder; FLUX.2 VAE
Loaded weights10.1 GiB
Default4 steps
LicenseApache-2.0

Klein 4B was the fastest model in this run. Its four-step default gives it a large speed advantage, while Transform makes it more versatile than the Create-only models. Peak VRAM reached 15.9 GiB during the 1024 × 1024 render.

RTX 5090 benchmark, 1024 × 1024Result
Time per image after warm-up1.76 s
Resident VRAM9.4 GiB
Peak VRAM15.9 GiB

FLUX.1 schnell

FLUX.1 schnell is Black Forest Labs' fast, text-to-image-only FLUX.1 model. Official model source.

Three image examples generated with flux1 schnell, from the article test.

FLUX.1 schnell, Q4_K_M, four steps, seed 42, 1024 × 1024.

Model configurationValue
Model and supporting files6.4 GiB + 9.7 GiB
Atomic Chat setupQ4_K_M model; fp16 T5-XXL; CLIP-L; FLUX VAE
Loaded weights15.7 GiB
Default4 steps
LicenseApache-2.0

Schnell took 2.80 seconds per image, compared with 1.76 for Klein 4B. Its 23.2 GiB peak leaves little room on a 24 GB-class card, so check actual free memory or use offloading.

RTX 5090 benchmark, 1024 × 1024Result
Time per image after warm-up2.80 s
Resident VRAM16.7 GiB
Peak VRAM23.2 GiB

FLUX.1 Krea Dev

FLUX.1 Krea Dev is a text-to-image FLUX.1 model released under the non-commercial FLUX.1 dev terms. The license distinguishes running the model commercially from using its generated outputs. Official model source.

Three image examples generated with flux1 krea dev, from the article test.

FLUX.1 Krea Dev, Q4_K_M, 20 steps, seed 42, 1024 × 1024.

Model configurationValue
Model and supporting files6.5 GiB + 9.7 GiB
Atomic Chat setupQ4_K_M model; fp16 T5-XXL; CLIP-L; FLUX VAE
Loaded weights15.7 GiB
Default20 steps; guidance 3.5
LicenseFLUX.1 dev, non-commercial

Krea Dev uses 20 steps compared with schnell's four, so this measures different default configurations. The examples show the resulting visual differences.

Its 23.3 GiB peak VRAM is close to schnell's. A 24 GB-class card offers little headroom at these settings. The FLUX.1 dev terms restrict model use, while separately permitting commercial use of outputs under their conditions.

RTX 5090 benchmark, 1024 × 1024Result
Time per image after warm-up11.42 s
Resident VRAM16.8 GiB
Peak VRAM23.3 GiB

Krea 2 Turbo

Krea 2 Turbo is a Create-mode model distributed under the Krea 2 Community License. Official model source.

Three image examples generated with krea 2 turbo, from the article test.

Krea 2 Turbo, Q4_K_M, eight steps, seed 42, 1024 × 1024.

Model configurationValue
Model and supporting files6.7 GiB + 2.6 GiB
Atomic Chat setupQ4_K_M model; Qwen3-VL-4B Q4_K_M encoder; Wan 2.1 VAE
Loaded weights9.3 GiB
Default8 steps
LicenseKrea 2 Community License

Krea 2 Turbo used less peak memory than either FLUX.1 model and took 5.71 seconds per image, about half the time of Krea Dev at its default settings. Compare the examples above for visual differences.

Krea 2 Turbo permits commercial use under its Community License when combined annual revenue, including affiliates, is below USD 1 million over the preceding 12 months, subject to the remaining license terms.

RTX 5090 benchmark, 1024 × 1024Result
Time per image after warm-up5.71 s
Resident VRAM9.9 GiB
Peak VRAM17.2 GiB

Qwen-Image

Qwen-Image is a Create-mode image model from Qwen, designed for image generation with text in the composition. Official model source.

Three image examples generated with qwen image, from the article test.

Qwen-Image, Q4_K_M, 20 steps, seed 42, 1024 × 1024.

Model configurationValue
Model and supporting files12.2 GiB + 4.6 GiB
Atomic Chat setupQ4_K_M model; Qwen2.5-VL-7B Q4_K_M encoder; Qwen VAE
Loaded weights16.4 GiB
Default20 steps; CFG 2.5; flow shift 3
LicenseApache-2.0

Qwen-Image is the largest model setup in this comparison. Its 24.4 GiB peak just exceeds what a nominal 24 GB card reports, so it needs a 32 GB card or CPU offload. It rendered the requested text correctly in the test, making it suited to posters, labels, packaging concepts, and other text-heavy images.

RTX 5090 benchmark, 1024 × 1024Result
Time per image after warm-up25.47 s
Resident VRAM17.0 GiB
Peak VRAM24.4 GiB

Qwen-Image-2.1

Qwen-Image-2.1 is a 7B model for text-to-image generation, reference-guided generation, and instruction-based editing. The model supports up to 10 reference images; Atomic Chat accepts a source image plus three additional references. Official model source.

Three image examples generated with qwen image 2 1, from the article test.

Qwen-Image-2.1, Q4_K, 40 steps, seed 42, 1024 × 1024, Create mode.

Model configurationValue
Model and supporting files3.9 GiB + 6.4 GiB
Atomic Chat setupQ4_K model; Qwen3-VL-8B Q4_K_M encoder; Qwen 2.1 VAE
Loaded weights8.7 GiB in Create mode
Default40 steps; CFG 6.0
LicenseQwen Research, non-commercial

Qwen-Image-2.1 had the longest generation time at its 40-step default, but used less peak memory than Qwen-Image. Its photo, text, and illustration examples are shown above; visual preference is subjective.

RTX 5090 benchmark, 1024 × 1024Result
Time per image after warm-up38.98 s
Resident VRAM9.7 GiB
Peak VRAM19.3 GiB
Rendered text“MORNING LIGHT” on one line

Hardware requirements for local AI image generation

For the tested 1024 by 1024 configurations, 16 GB-class GPUs are a starting point for Z-Image Turbo; larger models need more memory or offloading. Compare each measured peak with the free memory reported by your driver. Desktop applications and other workloads also consume memory.

The following NVIDIA cards are candidates for these workloads; only the RTX 5090 was benchmarked for this article:

  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (32 GB)
  • RTX 4090 (24 GB)
  • RTX 3090 (24 GB) can also be good options.

16 GB cards like NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 can also work, but they’re more limiting in terms of what models you can run.

On Macs, suitable configurations include:

  • MacBook Pro with M5 Pro: 24 GB or more of unified memory
  • MacBook Pro with M5 Max: 36 GB, 48 GB, 64 GB, or 128 GB of unified memory
  • Mac Studio

On Macs, unified memory is shared with macOS and other apps. The CUDA peaks below are a planning reference, not measured Apple Silicon requirements. Runtime, offloading, and image resolution can change memory use.

  • A 24 GB Mac is a starting point to evaluate Z-Image Turbo or FLUX.2 Klein 4B, with room reserved for macOS.
  • A 32 GB Mac provides more room to evaluate Krea 2 Turbo and Qwen-Image-2.1. FLUX.1 models may need offloading depending on other memory use.
  • A Mac with 36 GB or more offers a larger memory budget for the models in this list. These configurations were not tested here.

Note: We haven’t measured generation speed on a Mac as part of this benchmark.

You can sometimes run these models with less than 16 GB of memory by using lower quantizations, CPU offloading, or other memory-saving techniques, but 16 GB is a much more practical starting point.

The table below is a planning guide based on the RTX 5090 measurements. It does not confirm identical memory use on every GPU or runtime.

MemoryPlanning against the measured peaks
16 GBZ-Image Turbo peaked at 14.6 GiB. Klein 4B reached 15.9 GiB, leaving very little headroom.
20 GBZ-Image Turbo, FLUX.2 Klein 4B, and Krea 2 Turbo
24 GBZ-Image Turbo, Klein 4B, Krea 2 Turbo, and Qwen-Image-2.1 peaked below 20 GiB. FLUX.1 reached 23.2 to 23.3 GiB; allow for other memory use or offloading.
32 GBAll measured peaks were below 25 GiB at the tested settings.

How to Generate Images Locally in Atomic Chat

Atomic Chat runs image models through stable-diffusion.cpp, a C++ engine that also powers local FLUX and Qwen-Image inference. The app handles the downloads and setup.

  1. Install Atomic Chat and open Images.
  2. Install the stable-diffusion.cpp engine when prompted. It is about 100 MB and separate from model downloads.
  3. Pick a catalog model whose model and encoder files fit your storage and memory budget.
  4. Select Download, wait for the model files, then select Run. With text encoders included, a model takes about 7 to 17 GiB, and shared files are downloaded once.
  5. Write a specific prompt: subject, composition, lighting, visual style, and any required text. Select Generate to create the image. Change one variable per iteration.

FAQ

Can I create AI images locally?

Yes. With the models downloaded and a fully local workflow selected, generation can run offline on your computer. Cloud backends and API nodes send data to external services.

What local AI models can generate images?

Z-Image Turbo, FLUX.2 Klein 4B, FLUX.1 schnell, FLUX.1 Krea Dev, Krea 2 Turbo, Qwen-Image, and Qwen-Image-2.1, among others.

Are offline AI image generators free?

Most listed apps are free to download, and local generation does not require a per-image API payment. Model licenses differ: FLUX.1 Krea Dev restricts model use but separately permits commercial outputs under its terms; Qwen-Image-2.1 is for research or evaluation unless separately licensed; Krea 2 Turbo has a revenue threshold.

What is the best local AI image generator in 2026?

  • Atomic Chat is best if you need an easy-to-use local AI image generator that’s part of a broader offline AI app.
  • ComfyUI is best if you need deep, node-based customization.
  • Krita AI Diffusion is best if you already work in Krita and want generation inside layers and selections.
  • Draw Things is best if you’re a Mac user.

How much VRAM do I need?

At the tested settings, Z-Image Turbo peaked at 14.6 GiB. A 24 GB-class card has more room for Klein 4B, Krea 2 Turbo, and Qwen-Image-2.1. FLUX.1 peaks near that card class's capacity; Qwen-Image exceeds it. Use a larger memory budget or offloading when free memory is insufficient.

Best Local AI Video Generators Compared on Quality, Speed and VRAM

Best Local AI Video Generators Compared on Quality, Speed and VRAM

Compare local AI video generators on quality, speed and VRAM, with RTX 4090 benchmarks, example clips and an Atomic Chat setup guide.

10/9/26

16 min

Best Local LLMs for 12GB VRAM in 2026

Best Local LLMs for 12GB VRAM in 2026

Eight local LLMs for 12GB VRAM: exact GGUF files, RTX 3080 Ti speed and memory figures, plus Snake and physics tests on an RTX 4070.

9/30/26

15 min

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Alternatives Compared

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Alternatives Compared

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 with Opus, Fable and GPT-6 Astra, then choose a local Qwen, Ornith or Bonsai model for your hardware.

9/29/26

13 min

Jev 1.13: Can You Run It Locally? Laya Setup Guide

Jev 1.13: Can You Run It Locally? Laya Setup Guide

Can you run Jev 1.13 locally? Learn how it works, see our Jev vs Laya Tetris demo, and set up Laya as an independent local alternative.

9/25/26

12 min