Blog

/

Guides

/

Best Local AI Video Generators Compared on Quality, Speed and VRAM

Best Local AI Video Generators Compared on Quality, Speed and VRAM

Compare local video model configurations tested on an RTX 4090, then follow the Atomic Chat guide to download a model and generate your first clip.

Best Local AI Video Generators Compared on Quality, Speed and VRAM
Alex Shapiro
Alex Shapiro
Calendar icon

October 9, 2026

Table of Contents

We compared local AI video generators running LTX 2.5 and Wan 2.2, and checked HunyuanVideo 1.5 and MiniMax H3 as heavier alternatives. These models allow you to generate AI videos on-device without cloud APIs. We tested them across ComfyUI, WanGP, LTX Desktop, and Atomic Chat on an RTX 4090 with fixed prompts and seeds.

To generate local video from a model picker and prompt editor, start with Atomic Chat. You can download a video model in the app and use local chat and image generation in the same place. Follow the Atomic Chat quickstart below, or compare the measured model configurations before choosing your setup.

Best Local AI Video Generators At a Glance

Choose a workflow for your task. The benchmark tables below give the exact settings and measured times for each tested configuration.

Scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

ScenarioAppExact modelTested hardwareTrade-off
Fast drafts with soundComfyUI 0.38.2LTX 2.5 22B distilled, int8RTX 4090, 61 GB RAM24.6 s per 720p clip, but product shapes came out wrong
Little VRAM, plenty of RAMWanGP 17.00LTX 2.5 22B distilled, int8RTX 4090, 125 GB RAM5.9 GiB VRAM peak, 39 s per clip, ~41 GiB RAM
People, hands, facesComfyUI 0.38.2Wan 2.2 A14B fp8 + Lightning LoRARTX 4090, 125 GB RAM44 s per clip at 640 × 640 and 16 fps
Animate a still imageComfyUI 0.38.2LTX 2.5 22B distilled, int8RTX 4090, 61 GB RAM26.5 s per clip, invents what lies outside the photo
A desktop app with no node graphLTX Desktop 1.2.7LTX 2.5 Fast, bf16RTX 4090, 100 GB RAM119 s per 720p clip, 96 GB download
Chat, images and video in one appAtomic Chat 2.1.8Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B, Q4_K_MRTX 4090, 100 GB RAMBuilt-in video model picker and memory-fit badges; text-to-video workflow

Best Local AI Video Apps

Depending on where you run the video generation model, it can have an impact on VRAM utilization and speed. With that in mind, we also tested multiple apps, and the results are summarized below:

Scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

AppInstall on our test machineOSVideo modelsQueueFully local
ComfyUI 0.38.2About 5 min plus modelsWindows, Linux, macOSAny model with official templates or custom nodesYesYes, with API nodes left out
WanGP 17.00About 8 min, models download on first useWindows, Linux, macOSWan, LTX, HunyuanVideo and more, in its own formatsYes, also from the command lineYes
LTX Desktop 1.2.7Installer, then a 4.1 GB Python environment and 96 GB of modelsWindows, Linux, macOS on Apple SiliconLTX 2.5 FastNo, one clip at a timeYes when no API key is entered
Atomic Chat 2.1.8Installer, then a media engine and a 7.9 GB model, about a minute on a fast connectionWindows, Linux, macOSWan 2.2 TI2V-5B, LTX-2.3 DistilledNo, one clip at a timeYes

Atomic Chat

Atomic Chat is our free, open source desktop app for local AI. You generate clips on its Video page and use local chat and image models in the same app. The model catalog includes memory-fit badges to help you choose a download for your hardware.

The catalog in Atomic Chat 2.1.8 lists Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B and LTX-2.3 Distilled. We tested Wan 2.2 5B there. The LTX 2.5 and Wan A14B benchmarks in this article come from the other applications.

Video models in Atomic Chat 2.1.8 with memory-fit badges.

Video models in Atomic Chat 2.1.8, each with a memory-fit badge.

Choose Atomic Chat for an integrated local AI workflow. Download a video model from the catalog, write your prompt, and generate on the Video page. You can use chat and image generation in the same app. Follow the setup steps below to get started.

ComfyUI

ComfyUI is a node-based interface for image, video and audio models, most notably exposing in-depth settings such as steps, frame count, resolution and precision on any node. Due to extensive customization, it's one of the best local AI video generators on the market, but it also means a steeper learning curve.

Choose ComfyUI if you want every model in one place and control over each stage of the pipeline.

WanGP

WanGP is a Gradio app built for running video models on limited memory. It allows you to download quantized video model files directly from Hugging Face. WanGP's most notable feature is called memory profiles, which dictate how the model is stored in memory and partially offloaded to RAM. For example, Profile 4 keeps the model in pinned system RAM and streams it to the GPU block by block, which helps keep VRAM utilization low. This matters a lot for local video generation. In our test, for example, LTX 2.5 used only 5.9 GiB VRAM at its peak while running on an RTX 4090, at the cost of about 41 GiB of system RAM and 15 extra seconds per clip compared with ComfyUI.

Choose WanGP if your GPU has less memory than the model and your PC has plenty of RAM.

LTX Desktop

LTX Desktop is Lightricks' official standalone application, built for users who want a polished, standard desktop interface without dealing with node graphs.

To remain strictly offline, you need to run its local Gemma text encoder. By streaming unquantized weights directly from system RAM, LTX Desktop keeps VRAM usage low (8.4 GiB at its peak), though local mode on Windows and Linux still requires a GPU with at least 16 GB of VRAM. The heavy RAM offloading also makes it the slowest LTX setup tested and limits rendering to a single clip at a time.

Choose LTX Desktop if you only want LTX and prefer a polished app over a node graph.

Local Video Models Compared

Now that we've covered where to run the best local AI video generation models, let's compare each of the models directly.

Scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

ModelSizeModesAudioOutput in the official workflowLicence
LTX 2.5 distilled22BT2V, I2V and moreYes1280 × 704 at 24 fps, 121 framesLTX-2 Community License, paid licence above $10M annual revenue
Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B5BT2V and I2V in one modelNo1280 × 704 at 24 fps, 121 framesApache-2.0
Wan 2.2 A14B2 × 14B expertsSeparate T2V and I2V modelsNo640 × 640 at 16 fps, 81 framesApache-2.0

Benchmarking & Testing Methodology

All evaluations were conducted on a single RTX 4090 (24 GB VRAM) using official templates and each app's default settings. Where we changed a setting, such as adding the 4-step Lightning LoRA to Wan 2.2 A14B or running Wan 2.2 5B at 20 steps in WanGP, the tables show the exact configuration.

Each timing applies to the named model, precision, runtime and settings. Atomic Chat has one cold Linux/Vulkan check; the repeated warm results use other configurations. The example clips below show model behavior in those tested workflows.

  • Test Matrix: We ran 6 standardized scenarios tested across seeds 101, 202, and 303. On top of this matrix, we ran single clips to test low-VRAM settings, template defaults, the prompt enhancer and cold starts.
  • Latency Tracking: We timed each job from queue submission to final .mp4 export, separating cold runs, which include model loading, from warm runs. Repeated warm results are reported as medians unless a range is shown. Single-run checks have a completed count of 1/1.
  • Reproducibility: We used fixed prompts and seeds. The tables identify each app and configuration, with completed-run counts alongside the results. Qualitative ratings follow fixed evaluation criteria.

LTX 2.5

Lightricks’ 22-billion-parameter LTX 2.5 generates synchronized video and audio natively in a single pass. In testing, it was the fastest model by a wide margin, handled multi-object prompts better than competitors, and consistently executed complex camera moves (such as image-to-video push-ins).

LTX 2.5 struggled with precise geometric shapes in our text-to-video tests, rendering headphones as closed rings or detached earcups. It preserved the headphone geometry in all three image-to-video product runs.

LTX 2.5 image-to-video: camera push-in on a source photograph of black headphones.

Test results and observations:

LTX 2.5 text-to-video: three colored balls rolling across a kitchen table.

Scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

AppModeOutputColdWarmPeak VRAMPeak RAMFinished
ComfyUIText to video1280 × 704, 5 s, audio40 s24.6 s23.5 GiB40.5 GiB12/12
ComfyUIImage to video960 × 960, 5 s, audion/a26.5 s23.5 GiB40.6 GiB6/6
WanGPText to video1280 × 704, 5 s, audio57 s39 s5.9 GiB41.3 GiB12/12
WanGPImage to video960 × 960, 5 s, audion/a41 to 43 s8.1 GiB42.1 GiB6/6
LTX DesktopText to video1280 × 704, 5 s, audion/a119 s8.4 GiB35 to 47 GiB above idle1/1
  • Product Shot: Consistently fails complex object geometry in text-to-video mode: rendering headphones as closed rings or detached earcups across all tested applications (3/3).
  • Camera Movement: Executes smooth directional motion (e.g., forward sweeps) across all seeds (3/3).
  • Hands & Fine Detail: Maintains stable anatomical structure and realistic fluid dynamics during complex interactions.
  • Multi-Object Consistency: Keeps the three colored balls and the hand stopping the red one in 2/3 runs, the best result of all models.
  • Image-to-Video (Person): Preserves localized task motion, but introduces temporal artifacts (morphing headwear in 2/3 runs) when camera pull-backs reveal previously uncropped regions.
  • Image-to-Video (Product): Reliably executes directional camera moves (e.g., camera push-ins in 3/3 runs) while fully preserving the source product geometry.
  • Audio Generation: Natively generates synchronized audio for every render, with levels accurately reflecting scene context (near-silent for studio shots vs. ambient environmental sound for café and forest scenes).
LTX 2.5 text-to-video failure: headphones rendered as a closed ring.

Wan 2.2

Alibaba’s Wan 2.2 family is fully open-weights under the permissive Apache-2.0 license. It comes in two main variants: TI2V-5B, a single 5-billion-parameter model handling both text and image prompts at 720p, and A14B, a dual-expert Mixture-of-Experts model using separate checkpoints for text and image tasks.

  • TI2V-5B: Easy to run on mid-range VRAM budgets. It handles fluid camera moves cleanly, though it occasionally overlooks subtle positional prompts (such as slow object rotations).
  • A14B: Delivered the best hands, faces, and human details of any model tested. While its default 20-step pass is slow, pairing it with a 4-step Lightning LoRA drops render times from 360 to 44 seconds per clip: making it our pick for character-driven shots.
Wan 2.2 A14B with Lightning LoRA: hands pouring latte art.

Test results and observations:

Scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

Variant and appModeOutputColdWarmPeak VRAMPeak RAMFinished
TI2V-5B fp16, ComfyUIText to video1280 × 704, 5 s174 s167 s22.7 GiB21.6 GiB12/12
TI2V-5B fp16, ComfyUIImage to video960 × 960, 5 s181 s170 s23.3 GiB22.0 GiB6/6
TI2V-5B int8, WanGP (20 steps, as in ComfyUI)Text to video1280 × 704, 5 s174 s156 s14.3 GiB17.6 GiB4/4
TI2V-5B Q4_K_M, Atomic Chat (Linux, Vulkan)Text to video832 × 480, 5 s861 sn/a22.1 GiB17 GiB above idle1/1
A14B fp8 + 4-step LoRA, ComfyUIText to video640 × 640, 5 s57 s44 s23.5 GiB37.1 GiB12/12
A14B fp8 + 4-step LoRA, ComfyUIImage to video640 × 640, 5 s59 s44 s23.5 GiB37.2 GiB6/6
A14B fp8, 20 steps (template default), ComfyUIText and image to video640 × 640, 5 sn/a360 to 364 s23.5 GiB36.7 GiB2/2

Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B Evaluation

  • Product Shot: Accurately preserves initial subject geometry, but consistently ignores rotational motion prompts (remained static in 3/3 runs).
  • Camera Movement: Renders clean camera paths without adding unprompted background elements.
  • Hands & Fine Detail: Accurately handles fluid dynamics (latte pour/foam), though hand tracking was partially obscured by tight framing.
  • Multi-Object Consistency: Poor object persistence: objects frequently merge or flicker in multi-element scenes.
  • Image-to-Video (Person): Prone to sudden mid-clip jump-cuts (3/3) and occasional facial distortion (1/3).
  • Image-to-Video (Product): Ignores camera movement prompts and hallucinates untracked elements (spurious hands or objects appearing in 2/3 runs).
  • Linux / Atomic Chat Limitations: VRAM spikes during decoding triggered automatic system offloading. Extremely high latency (861 s at 832 × 480; aborted after 24 min at 1280 × 704).
Wan 2.2 5B image-to-video example with a red object.

Wan 2.2 A14B (with 4-step Lightning LoRA) Evaluation

  • Product Shot: Successfully executes object rotation (2/3), but introduces unwanted camera movement when a static frame is explicitly requested (2/3).
  • Camera Movement: Misinterprets directorial prompts: rendering a physical quadcopter drone in-frame when given "drone shot" instructions (3/3).
  • Hands & Fine Detail: The most stable hands and fine motion of all tested models.
  • Multi-Object Consistency: Consistently over-generates discrete items (e.g., rendering 5 balls instead of the requested 3 in 3/3 runs).
  • Image-to-Video (Person): Keeps the character stable and tracks the subject through complex camera pull-backs.
  • Image-to-Video (Product): Subject geometry distorts or morphs mid-clip (2/3).
  • Sampling Overhead: Reverting to the un-accelerated 20-step default template increases render time by 8× while producing entirely different compositions for identical seeds.
Wan 2.2 A14B failure: five balls generated when the prompt requested three.

Honorable Mentions

Two other open models regularly appear in discussions about local video generation. We left both out of the main comparison: HunyuanVideo 1.5 for its render times and MiniMax H3 for its license terms.

HunyuanVideo 1.5. Tencent's 8.3-billion-parameter model includes an official 720p workflow template for ComfyUI, but this workflow is extremely slow. In our testing on an RTX 4090, generating a single 5-second 1280 × 720 clip took 1,590 seconds (26.5 minutes) while consuming 23.5 GiB of VRAM, 29 GiB of system RAM, and requiring 29 GB of storage space. Render times this slow: roughly 65 times longer than LTX 2.5 on identical hardware: make day-to-day local iteration impractical. For faster image-to-video, Tencent offers a 480p step-distilled model that renders a clip in about 75 seconds on an RTX 4090.

MiniMax H3. MiniMax's open H3-Base is a 33-billion-parameter model with bf16 weights. Official deployment examples use a four-GPU setup, but WanGP can run it in 5 to 6 GB of VRAM at 480p. Key features like automatic prompt rewriting and 2K upscaling are restricted to MiniMax's cloud API. The base community license explicitly excludes usage within the US, EU, UK, and South Korea without separate regional authorization, so we skipped testing it locally.

What Hardware Do You Need for Local AI Video?

Local video generation is primarily VRAM-bound. The tested configurations and peak memory usage are detailed below.

Note: ComfyUI aggressively allocates available VRAM as a cache, so reported peak usage on a 24 GB GPU often hovers near ~24 GiB even when a workflow requires significantly less memory to run.

Scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

GPUSystem RAM usedFiles on diskModel, precisionResolution, framesOffloadTime per clipPeak VRAM
RTX 4090 24 GB22 GiB17 GBWan 2.2 5B fp16, ComfyUI1280 × 704, 121Automatic167 s21 to 23 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB29 GiB17 GBWan 2.2 5B fp16, ComfyUI --novram1280 × 704, 121Everything236 s10.4 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB18 GiB57 GB with LTXWan 2.2 5B int8, WanGP1280 × 704, 121Profile 4156 s14.3 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB37 GiB62 GB for T2V and I2VWan 2.2 A14B fp8 + LoRA, ComfyUI640 × 640, 81Automatic44 s23.5 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB41 GiB37 GBLTX 2.5 int8, ComfyUI1280 × 704, 121Automatic24.6 s23.5 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB41 GiB57 GB with WanLTX 2.5 int8, WanGP1280 × 704, 121Profile 439 s5.9 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB35 to 47 GiB above idle67 GB for LTXLTX 2.5 bf16, LTX Desktop1280 × 704, 121Streaming119 s8.4 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB17 GiB above idle7.9 GBWan 2.2 5B Q4_K_M, Atomic Chat (Linux, Vulkan)832 × 480, 121Automatic, retried with offload861 s22.1 GiB
RTX 4090 24 GB29 GiB29 GBHunyuanVideo 1.5 fp16, ComfyUI1280 × 720, 121Automatic1,590 s23.5 GiB
  • 24-32 GB VRAM: We ran the reported benchmarks on a 24 GB RTX 4090. LTX 2.5 and Wan A14B used roughly 37 to 47 GiB of system RAM in several configurations, so plan for 64 GB of RAM when using those setups.
  • 16 GB VRAM: Consider the offloaded LTX 2.5 setups in WanGP or LTX Desktop, or Wan 2.2 5B with offloading. Compare the exact settings and memory measurements in the table; these are RTX 4090 results, not tests on a 16 GB GPU.
  • 8-12 GB VRAM: Offloading is important. On our RTX 4090, LTX 2.5 in WanGP peaked at 5.9 GiB for 1280 × 704 text-to-video and 8.1 GiB for 960 × 960 image-to-video. Wan 2.2 5B at 720p peaked at 10.4 GiB in ComfyUI with full offloading. ComfyUI also documents an 8 GB route for Wan 2.2 5B using native offloading; our measured 720p configuration used more memory.

Note on Apple Silicon: While ComfyUI, LTX Desktop, and Atomic Chat support macOS, CUDA benchmarks do not translate to Apple's unified memory architecture.

Quickstart: Generate a Video in Atomic Chat

Choose a video model from the built-in catalog and generate from a prompt. These steps show the desktop interface in Atomic Chat 2.1.8.

1. Install the app and open Video

Download Atomic Chat for your desktop and open Video in the sidebar. Install the media engine when prompted, then use Create videos. In the tested version, Image to video is marked as coming soon.

Atomic Chat video generation modes, with Create videos available and Image to video marked coming soon.

2. Choose and download a video model

Open the model picker and check the memory-fit badges before choosing a download. The catalog shown here includes Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B and LTX-2.3 Distilled. Our setup screenshots use Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B Q4_K_M. Click Download to add the model to the app.

3. Write your prompt and generate a clip

Describe your scene in the prompt field. Choose a resolution and duration, then click Generate. Start with a short clip to check the composition before increasing the resolution. The screenshot below shows the settings available for Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B.

Resolution presets and video generation settings for Wan 2.2 5B in Atomic Chat.

ComfyUI Setup for Node-Based Workflows

Here's how to set up local text-to-video (T2V) and image-to-video (I2V) inference using the official Wan 2.2 TI2V-5B template in ComfyUI.

1. Download Model Assets

Place the required model files into their respective subdirectories inside ComfyUI/models/:

Scroll horizontally to compare all columns.

ComponentTarget DirectoryFile NameSize
Diffusion Modelmodels/diffusion_models/wan2.2_ti2v_5B_fp16.safetensors9.31 GB
Text Encodermodels/text_encoders/umt5_xxl_fp8_e4m3fn_scaled.safetensors6.27 GB
VAEmodels/vae/wan2.2_vae.safetensors1.31 GB

2. Load the Workflow Template

  1. Launch ComfyUI.
  2. Open Templates and select Wan 2.2 5B Video Generation.
  3. Confirm default sampler and latent settings:
  • Resolution: 1280 × 704
  • Frame Count: 121 (5 seconds @ 24 fps)
  • Steps / CFG: 20 / 5.0
  • Sampler / Shift: uni_pc / 8

3. Run Inference

Text-to-Video (T2V):

  1. Enter scene directions into the Positive Prompt node.
  2. Click Run. Rendered clips will be exported to ComfyUI/output/video/.

Image-to-Video (I2V):

  1. Select the bypassed Load Image node in the template and press Ctrl + B to enable it.
  2. Upload the source image.
  3. Adjust target height and width settings to match the input aspect ratio (e.g., 960 × 960 for 1:1 square media).
  4. Click Run.

Fix Slow Generation, Memory Errors, and Flickering

Running video models locally often comes with technical hurdles, but most issues with memory, speed, and visual artifacts stem from a few predictable bottlenecks. Understanding how these models handle resources can help you quickly troubleshoot setup problems.

Out of memory. Enable memory offloading and reduce resolution or frame count if the job exceeds your GPU memory. In our tests, we used ComfyUI's --novram option for Wan 2.2 5B and Profile 4 in WanGP for LTX 2.5. Offloading increases system RAM use. Check the table for the measured settings and peaks for each mode before choosing a workflow.

Slow generation. Because frame count and resolution scale render times almost linearly, it is best to test workflows with a short, low-res draft before rendering the final output. Speedup techniques can make a massive difference: Wan 14B's Lightning LoRA cuts render times from 360 down to 44 seconds, though it changes the composition for the same seed. Keep in mind that LTX 2.5's prompt enhancer adds around 11 seconds, and default step counts vary widely across apps: Wan 2.2 5B runs 20 steps in ComfyUI, 30 in Atomic Chat, and 50 in WanGP (where it took 346 seconds).

Long loading and high RAM usage. The initial run after startup includes loading model files from disk, adding about 7 extra seconds for Wan 2.2 5B in ComfyUI and 16 seconds for LTX 2.5. Additionally, heavy models like LTX 2.5 and Wan 14B consume 37 to 47 GiB of system RAM, so a system with 32 GB of RAM is likely to swap to disk. Storage space is another crucial factor: you will need 17 GB for Wan 2.2 5B, around 62 GB for both Wan 14B models, and 37 to 96 GB for LTX 2.5 depending on the application.

Wrong encoder or VAE. Mismatched files lead directly to broken output because each model expects a specific pipeline. Wan 2.2 5B requires wan2.2_vae, whereas Wan 2.2 14B relies on the older wan_2.1_vae. LTX 2.5 depends on its own separate video VAE, audio VAE, and spatial upscaler. The safest way to prevent mismatches is to build workflows directly from official templates and download the exact dependencies specified.

Flickering and lost objects. We observed flickering and missing objects in the tested workflows. These tests do not isolate the effects of the model, runtime and generation settings. Prompts loaded with too many distinct objects increase the chances of items being duplicated or dropped entirely. If text-to-video distorts a subject or product, driving the generation from a clean reference image (image-to-video) usually helps: LTX 2.5 kept the product's shape in all three image-to-video runs. Always generate a single test render before queuing overnight batches.

Bottom Line

Use Atomic Chat to generate local video from a model picker and prompt editor. The catalog shows memory-fit badges, and you download models from the same interface you use to generate. You can also work with local chat and image models in the app.

Download Atomic Chat to try the desktop workflow, and follow the steps above for your first clip.

Best Local LLMs for 12GB VRAM in 2026

Best Local LLMs for 12GB VRAM in 2026

Eight local LLMs for 12GB VRAM: exact GGUF files, RTX 3080 Ti speed and memory figures, plus Snake and physics tests on an RTX 4070.

9/30/26

15 min

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Alternatives Compared

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Alternatives Compared

Compare Claude Sonnet 5.5 with Opus, Fable and GPT-6 Astra, then choose a local Qwen, Ornith or Bonsai model for your hardware.

9/29/26

13 min

Jev 1.13: Can You Run It Locally? Laya Setup Guide

Jev 1.13: Can You Run It Locally? Laya Setup Guide

Can you run Jev 1.13 locally? Learn how it works, see our Jev vs Laya Tetris demo, and set up Laya as an independent local alternative.

9/25/26

12 min

Best Local AI Image Generators in 2026: Apps and Models

Best Local AI Image Generators in 2026: Apps and Models

Compare local AI image generators, with seven models benchmarked on an RTX 5090. See image examples, generation speed, memory use, and license limits.

9/25/26

14 min